Mao Mushika vs Shiho Akita Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W L W W L
Form
L W W L W L L W W LHead-2-Head: Mushika 1 - 0 Akita
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mushika winning 2 and Akita winning 0. The last match between Mushika and Akita was at the W15 Kawaguchi, 07-06-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Mao Mushika getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mao Mushika | 1 |
| Shiho Akita | 0 |
W15 Kawaguchi(07-06-2024)
7
6
6
3
| Mushika | Stats | Akita |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (11-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 836 | Ranking | 439 |
| 718 | Highest Rank | 221 |
| 19 | Age | 35 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 7 |
| 56% (67-52) | Career Total W/L | 57% (383-294) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $3,720 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Arnaldi VS Coric PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-3 |
Stats 
Mao Mushika
Player
Shiho Akita
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:4:0 | Average Match Time | 2:4:0 |
| 62% (44/71) | 1st Serve % | 53% (42/79) |
| 66% (29/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (28/42) |
| 56% (15/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (15/37) |
| 31% (4/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 46% (36/79) | Return Points Win % | 38% (27/71) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mao Mushika Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lucciana Perez Alarcon
Player
Mao Mushika
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mao Mushika
Player
Merna Refaat
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
8
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
47 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
108
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Alsola
Player
Mao Mushika
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
76
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(5) 3-6 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Nao Nishino
Player
Mao Mushika
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mao Mushika
Player
Hong Yi Cody Wong
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
81%
(
47 of
58)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
55
|
3-6 6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mio Mushika
Player
Mao Mushika
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mao Mushika
Player
Koharu Niimi
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Mao Mushika
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
17 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Shiho Akita Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Janice Tjen
Player
Shiho Akita
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shiho Akita
Player
Mio Mushika
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mingge Xu
Player
Shiho Akita
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Shiho Akita
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shiho Akita
Player
Kurea Hayasaka
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Shiho Akita
Player
Ya Hsin Lee
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
51 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shiho Akita
Player
Shanelle Iaconi
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hanyu Guo
Player
Shiho Akita
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
83
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (67/52) | Win/Loss | 57% (383/294) |
| 56% (148/116) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (851/671) |
| 53% (1301/1152) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7287/6530) |
| 57% (57/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (264/193) |
| 57% (4/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (15/19) |
| 57% (4/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (76/65) |
| 40% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 62% (28/17) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 141 | Aces Total | 501 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 300 | Total Double Faults | 1725 |
| 1:20:15 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 383.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 554.43 |
| 57% (3232/5705) | 1st Serve % | 58% (12774/21948) |
| 61% (1985/3232) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7943/12774) |
| 45% (1122/2473) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (3959/9174) |
| 50% (321/648) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1464/3032) |
| 46% (2495/5456) | Return Points Win % | 48% (10699/22421) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 17% (2/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (27/28) | Challenger W/L | 54% (256/220) |
| 63% (40/24) | Futures W/L | 66% (125/64) |
| 56% (66/117) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (377/654) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 17% (1/6) |
| 53% (9/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (53/101) |
| 46% (12/26) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (95/181) |
| 93% (67/62) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (372/328) |
| 7% (67/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (372/42) |
| 10% (52/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (303/54) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
